5
THE STOCK MARKET
The Initial Public Offering (IPO) of a private company, on 30 July 2004,
was subscribed 8 times. 60 % of the offer was reserved for Qualified
Institutional Bidders (QIB). The Foreign Institutional Investors (FII) limit in
the company was 24%.
Individuals were given Re.10 lakh each from banks to buy shares.
Exploiting this some might have availed themselves of the loan from different
banks.
Some newspapers, on 14 August 2004, reported that $450 to $ 500 million
of foreign money would flow into India to buy the shares of a private
company. They said this to enable some companies to take money abroad for
acquisitions.
A big private
company came out with a public issue in the last week of July 2004. The
LIC and the nationalized banks released a huge amount of money to the
public to buy its shares.
On
23 July 2004 the Union Government gave a loan of Re. 362 crore at 6.1% interest
to the Unit Trust of India (UTI) for meeting the shortfall in its
assured return schemes.
However, a newspaper said that the Indians used pen and not sword to
argue against foreign investments. The paper in another place said that enemy
was within, and it was going to be more difficult to engage.
On 27 September, 2004 an Indian company listed its securities on the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE). It was the first Indian Engineering Company to list
its securities on the NYSE.
The
initial public offering (IPO) of Jet Airlines on 18 February 2005 received bids
for 7.32 crore shares against the issue size of 1.72 crore. The Hindu
reported that the domestic and international institutional investors were
actively placing bids and they placed eight times the maximum allowable shares.
The bidding price band was Re. 980-1,125 and majority bids were received at the
upper end of the price band.
As in the case
of the TCS, the financial institutions released over Re.7000 crore to buy the
shares of Jet Airways. The Union Cabinet would not have discussed the pros and
cons of buying these shares. It is not clear whether the Cabinet Committee on
Economic Affairs or any Group of Ministers discussed it or not. There were many
such committees during the NDA rule to circumvent the Constitution.
A decision of a Group of Ministers or even the decision of the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs cannot be equivalent to the decision of the Union Cabinet because these Committees and Group of Ministers are at best parts of the Union Cabinet only and the parts can have no real power.
A decision of a Group of Ministers or even the decision of the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs cannot be equivalent to the decision of the Union Cabinet because these Committees and Group of Ministers are at best parts of the Union Cabinet only and the parts can have no real power.
The New Indian Express
on 3 March 2004 reported that Reliance Infocomm sold 86 lakh shares of the ONGC
for a value of Re.746 crore through a block deal making a profit of Re.100
crore in less than 18 months. The NDA Government, while selling the shares said
that it was selling shares to the public. But what happened? The Reliance cornered
it!
As
a reply to the letter No.52 dated 22 June 2005, Mr. M.Damodaran, Chairman,
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), on 27 June 2005 said that the
SEBI was contemplating strong action against vanishing companies and unscrupulous
promoters particularly those companies that amassed crores of rupees from
gullible investors on the 1990s primary market boom.
Now,
there were reports that the public issue of the Syndicate Bank was
oversubscribed by 32 times. The media brigands did not publish the views of the
public in this matter. 52 letters also
went in vain as the Government rejected the demand to reserve the shares to
various States.
No comments:
Post a Comment